Friday, June 02, 2006

We're always here for you, GW!

June 2, 2006

Bush Backs Amendment Banning Gay Marriage

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Filed at 10:48 a.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush will promote a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage on Monday, the eve of a scheduled Senate vote on the cause that is dear to his conservative backers.

The amendment would prohibit states from recognizing same-sex marriages. To become law, the proposal would need two-thirds support in the Senate and House, and then be ratified by at least 38 state legislatures.

It stands little chance of passing the 100-member Senate, where proponents are struggling to get even 50 votes. Several Republicans oppose the measure, and so far only one Democrat -- Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska -- says he will vote for it.

The Senate Judiciary Committee approved the amendment on May 18 along party lines after a shouting match between a Democrat and the chairman, Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa. He bid Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., ''good riddance'' after Feingold declared his opposition to the amendment and his intention to leave the meeting.

Bush aides said he would be making his remarks on the subject Monday.

A slim majority of Americans oppose gay marriage, according to a poll by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press from March. But the poll also showed attitudes are changing: 63 percent opposed gay marriage in February 2004.

Those poll results don't reflect how people might feel about amending the Constitution to ban gay marriage.

The Massachusetts Supreme Court decided to legalize such marriages in 2003. A year later, San Francisco issued thousands of marriage licenses to gay couples.

This November, initiatives banning same-sex marriages are expected to be on the ballot in Idaho, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia and Wisconsin. In 2004, 13 states approved initiatives prohibiting gay marriage or civil unions, with 11 states casting votes on Election Day.

Bush benefited as religious conservatives turned out to vote and helped him defeat Democratic Sen. John Kerry in 2004. In Ohio, an initiative rejecting the legality of civil unions won handily. The same state tipped the election to Bush.

''The president firmly believes that marriage is an enduring and sacred institution between men and women and has supported measures to protect the sanctity of marriage,'' White House spokesman Ken Lisaius said.

Bush has lost support among conservatives who blame the White House and Congress for runaway government spending, illegal immigration and lack of action on social issues such as the gay marriage amendment.

Opponents of the amendment objected to Bush promoting a measure they said amounts to discrimination.

''This is fundamentally both a civil rights and religious freedom issue and the president's position of supporting amending the constitution is just dead wrong,'' said Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State. ''This is simply to give ammunition to the so-called religious right just to show that the president is still with them.''

It's good to know that when push comes to shove, when the new Iraqi government is claiming (correctly or not) that Iraqi civilians are being killed every day by American soldiers in the light of two sets of killings under investigation (in Haditha and Ishaqi) even as the insurgency gets stronger in Sunni-dominated areas, when Iran shows no signs of abandoning its nuclear ambitions, when the President and the Prime Minister of Palestine are at war over who controls the security forces, when we are hitting the 25th anniversary of the AIDS epidemic with no end in sight in spite of the best abstinence-only efforts, when the NSA is data-mining the nation's phone records, when job growth is slowing and the market is nose-diving because of worries about inflation, when half the nation is up in arms about our "broken" immigration, (not to mention when Taylor Hicks won American Idol) good old Bushie has the gays to rely on: all he has to do is stand up for marriage and against those nefarious sodomites and everything will be okay!

Surely, my partner and I are one face of the biggest problem facing America, nay!, the world.

6 comments:

John said...

So how come the little kid in the restaurant almost gets hit by a car, but Bush gets to be president?

RottweilerTOM said...

because as Forrest Gump concluded: SHIT HAPPENS!!

Tyler said...

Of course, the very production of Forrest Gump confirms that fact.

RottweilerTOM said...

Honey, simply because Forrest did not wear Estee Lauder makeup and Prada shoes should not cause you to impugn on a GREAT AMERICAN classic!!!!! have you seen the Times of Harvey Milk yet??????

Tyler said...

I have not seen the Times of Harvey Milk, though I know that I should. I just never get to movies and always end up doing something stupid on weekends when I am free.

As for Forest Gump. In my opinion, I am afraid, it is one of the worst movies, in terms of acting, story and overall message made in my lifetime. I know that I am an outlier there, but that is, in fact, the way that I feel.

How's your doggie doing? I don't think I told you, but we're getting a dog in August. I'm so excited (and I just can't hide it).

RottweilerTOM said...

First of all, How ON EARTH can you say that movie was ensconced (George Constanza’s word) with bad acting?? Quite the contrary. As to, The Times of Harvey Milk – it’s available at Blockbuster (you know, the place you and Fernando walk past everyday).

I am thrilled you guys are getting a pet. Remember, unlike str8 marriage, it is a lifetime commitment!!! Patience is a VIRTUE! Please make sure the dog is taller than a football, won’t wear pink nail polish and when you get HIM he is only allowed to socialize with Enya, my Rott who will teach him appropriate behavior.

This morning after my gym workout (or attempt) I did my usual dog park thing and this other Lab was running circles around her owner (wouldn’t return Enya’s ball). It wasn’t the taking of the ball that bothered me; it was the owner’s inability to get the ball back from her own dog which made the dog extremely unruly. Therefore, I walked over and said something like ‘let me try’ and the woman (as sweet a disposition that there is, simply will not discipline the dog properly) I threw the dog to the ground and put the living fear in the bitch and she ended up dropping (returning) the ball in front of me. I walked over to the owner and said THAT is how you teach your dog proper behavior.